[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] Endangered Parks List



I understand that the engines are different, but I'd still like to see
some numbers.  How much pollution is generated in a snowmobile-hour?
How much pollution is generated by an automobile-hour?  How many
snowmobile-hours on average are done in Yellowstone every year?  How man
automobile-hours are done in Denver or Atlanta every year?  Have you
ever driven in Denver or Atlanta?  Those cities are crazy with the
traffic, it's hard for me to believe that the parallel exists as the
report claims..

Cleek
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 01:09:04AM -0500, jtwilkins@comcast.net tried to make me believe:
> cars have admission standards snowmobiles don't... Not that this is then end
> all answer but I think I really makes a difference
> JTW
> I'm sorry if you consider this a rant I don't mean to waste you time if it
> is.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Billie H. Cleek" <cleek@cleekhouse.com>
> To: <AT-L@mailman.backcountry.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [at-l] Endangered Parks List
> 
> 
> > I'll preface this by saying that I'm a stubborn skeptic.  And now I'll
> > ask some questions:
> >
> > The report I read indicated that the smog in Yellowstone is as bad as
> > Denver and Atlanta, and indicated that the primary cause was
> > snowmobiling.  This makes me doubt the accuracy of this report, and
> > here's why:  How many cars does it take to produce as much pollution as
> > a snowmobile?  How many snowmobiles are run in Yellowstone every year
> > and for how long?  It sounds like propaganda to me.  However, I'll also
> > admit that I've not yet been to Yellowstone and have no experience with
> > snowmobiles.  I'm just saying that on the surface this report brings
> > questions to my mind that I'd like to have clarified.
> >
> > Anyone out there capable of clearing this up for me?  And please, I'm
> > just honestly looking for facts, not opinions or rants.
> >
> > Cleek
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 08:37:21PM -0500, saunterer@jimbullard.org tried
> to make me believe:
> > > At 06:39 PM 3/25/02 -0500, jtwilkins@comcast.net wrote:
> > > >interesting news
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Endangered Parks List
> > > >Mon Mar 25,11:34 AM ET
> > > >By The Associated Press
> > > >
> > > >The National Parks Conservation Association's annual list of "America's
> 10
> > > >Most Endangered National Parks:"
> > > >. . . clip . . .
> > > >_Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming and Montana, air pollution from
> > > >snowmobiles.
> > >
> > > There was a segment on the evening news about Yellowstone's
> > > problems.  President Clinton had banned snowmobiles and Bush promptly
> > > rescinded the order.  I suppose if you're in the oil business you gotta
> do
> > > what's necessary to sell your product.  Too bad Bush isn't in the
> snowshoe
> > > business.
> > >
> > > sAunTerer
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > >From the AT-L mailing list         est. 1995
> > > Need help?  http://www.at-l.org
> > > Archives: http://www.backcountry.net/arch/at/
> > > Change your options or unsubscribe:
> > > http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
> >
> > --
> > The opposite of paranoia: The absurd belief that one is NOT being
> persecuted.
> > _______________________________________________
> > From the AT-L mailing list         est. 1995
> > Need help?  http://www.at-l.org
> > Archives: http://www.backcountry.net/arch/at/
> > Change your options or unsubscribe:
> > http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
> 
> _______________________________________________
> >From the AT-L mailing list         est. 1995
> Need help?  http://www.at-l.org
> Archives: http://www.backcountry.net/arch/at/
> Change your options or unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l

-- 
The opposite of paranoia: The absurd belief that one is NOT being persecuted.