[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] Re: AT-L digest, Vol 1 #850 - 55 msgs



I had been assuming that this whole thread was a tongue-in-cheek spoof.

Are people actually serious?

Chainsaw

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim and/or Ginny Owen" <spiriteagle99@hotmail.com>
To: <at-l@mailman.backcountry.net>
Cc: <chaynes@megalink.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:57 PM
Subject: [at-l] Re: AT-L digest, Vol 1 #850 - 55 msgs


> "Clifford R. Haynes" wrote:
> >Arrange them for what?
> <snip>
> >If you trying to get at a caste system, I suppose some folks have to
> >classify folks into caste groups, often based on there styles and
> >preferences ( there's often being one of the upper castes in there
system).
> >Personally I don't much care about other folks caste systems on the
trail.
> >I
> >suppose some folks need them to be comfortable with there place in life,
> >but
> >I have never felt the need for it.
>
>
>
> Cliff -
> Be careful -- the "I don't give a damn about your caste system" attitude
is
> the essence of "Hike your own hike"  :-))
>
> Personally, I don't recognize or accept caste systems - on the trail or
off.
> As you pointed out - the only purpose of a caste hierarchy is to make
> someone feel good at the expense of someone else.  I won't buy into that
> stuff.
>
> Walk softly,
> Jim
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
>
> _______________________________________________
> From the AT-L mailing list         est. 1995
> Need help?  http://www.at-l.org
> Archives: http://www.backcountry.net/arch/at/
> Change your options or unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
>