[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] Very Damn Long, RnR, was: Cost to remove a blowdown

Subject: [at-l] Very Damn Long, RnR, was: Cost to remove a blowdown
From: orangebug74@yahoo.com (Orange Bug)
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 20:29:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <48.7da80ee.29bd5082@aol.com>

Too long, Redhead. It really isn't important enough to waste such good
passion and time to respond to such. 

Gads, filters rule!

Bill...
<thanks anyway>

--- DaRedhead@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 3/10/02 4:36:10 PM US Eastern Standard Time, 
> RoksnRoots@aol.com writes:
> 
<who cares what, or why would it matter?> 
>
> Hmmm.  I guess that means that the previous emails by you in the past
> year or so, which include little BUT defamation, towards individuals
> and the list as a whole, are not to be considered anything but valid
> Trail logic - like the one where you pointed out that this list
> simply existing hurt the Trail?  ...

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
http://mail.yahoo.com/

References:
- [at-l] Very Damn Long, RnR, was: Cost to remove a blowdown
  - From: DaRedhead@aol.com (DaRedhead@aol.com)

Prev by Date: [at-l] Fw: Thru hiker Survivor Fire
Next by Date: [at-l] Fw: Thru hiker Survivor Fire
Prev by thread: [at-l] Very Damn Long, RnR, was: Cost to remove a blowdown
Next by thread: [at-l] Very Damn Long, RnR, was: Cost to remove a blowdown
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread