[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] Sunscreen

Subject: [at-l] Sunscreen
From: atrerunner@yahoo.com (ATRerunner)
Date: 11 Mar 2002 01:43:43 GMT
References: <mailman.1015738060.8886.at-l@mailman.backcountry.net>

Consumer Reports mag did a test of many sunscreens in the June '01
issue...as I recall, they concluded that the benefits above spf 30 were
negligible, but if the formula for assigning spf values has changed
since then, perhaps that is no longer true. I remember that Rite-Aid
spf-30 was judged to be about the best deal they found.

ATR



--

 - Posted via http://forums.backcountry.net

Prev by Date: [at-l] Bagel Longevity Revisited
Next by Date: [at-l] tripping report
Prev by thread: [at-l] Sunscreen
Next by thread: [at-l] Mission of the AT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread