[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] Is this true?
- Subject: [at-l] Is this true?
- From: dekkerd@rocketmail.com (Rob)
- Date: 7 Mar 2002 13:22:44 GMT
- References: <mailman.1015371508.72649.at-l@mailman.backcountry.net>
James R Davidso wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 23:54:00 -0500 "Clifford R. Haynes"
> <chaynes@megalink.net> writes:
> > I wouldn't be overly concerned for them because they chose to travel
> > that way. Frankly as there get to be more and more ultralighters, I
> find
> > myself becomming less inclined to put myself out, to make up for there
> > decision to travel light.
> I agree it's hard to be concerned about those who choose to hike
> unprepared. But ultralight should not / does not mean unprepared. A bivi
> can weight as little as 18 oz. and there are many ways to tarp or tent
> at a pound or two. Anyone who thinks they are ultralighting and doesn't
> have everything they need to be "self contained" should take another
> look at how they got light. To me ultralight means, I am prepared for my
> hike but traveling very light. Not that I left all my gear at home so my
> pack doesn't weigh much.
> woodelf
To borrow from the commercial; Equinox Bivy=6.6oz 5x9 poncho/tarp=8oz
Always having a shelter=priceless
--
- Posted via http://forums.backcountry.net