[at-l] AT-L Content

[saunterer@jimbullard.org (saunterer@jimbullard.org)]

At 05:32 PM 2/28/02 -0500, RoksnRoots@aol.com wrote:
>I believe AT-L could be
>improved if a descending scroll website forum was established for
>non-archiveable material. Most of what I scrolled through today does not
>deserve the time, space, and effort of being deposited into an archive file.

According to whom?  Seems to me if "most" of what is here is unacceptable 
to you it's because "most" of us find it acceptable. Give it a rest 
RnR.  If the rest of us leave you'll only have yourself to complain to.

sAunTerer