[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] In the interest of loooooong posts

Subject: [at-l] In the interest of loooooong posts
From: kahley7@ptd.net (kahley)
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 08:25:21 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20020203000130.01fb8520@northnet.org>
References: <006a01c1ac66$90a8ae60$325091d1@lwbooher><5.1.0.14.2.20020202170621.00a34680@pop3.norton.antivirus><5.1.0.14.2.20020202224439.00a34ec0@pop3.norton.antivirus>

At 12:07 AM 2/3/02 -0500, saunterer@jimbullard.org wrote:
>Personally, I like to see at least a line or two to let me know exactly 
>what the poster is responding to.  If there are already 4-5 posts under 
>the Subject it can sometimes be hard to tell which prompted the response.

It's also helpful if the author of the quoted material is named so I can go 
back
an read the original in it's entirety if I want more.

References:
- [at-l] In the interest of loooooong posts
  - From: lwbooher@halifax.com (Leslie Booher)
- [at-l] In the interest of loooooong posts
  - From: revmrf@kingcon.com (Martin Fors)
- [at-l] In the interest of loooooong posts
  - From: revmrf@kingcon.com (Martin Fors)
- [at-l] In the interest of loooooong posts
  - From: saunterer@jimbullard.org (saunterer@jimbullard.org)

Prev by Date: Re[2]: [at-l] Hiker Hints for 02'ers
Next by Date: [at-l] New Leki poles - YEA!! - but help, please?
Prev by thread: [at-l] In the interest of loooooong posts
Next by thread: [at-l] In the interest of loooooong posts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread