[at-l] In the interest of loooooong posts

[lwbooher@halifax.com (Leslie Booher)]

It's worse when there's no clue at all what the post said that the next
person is responding to.  I hate that!  I'd much rather have the original
post on the bottom so that I can refer to it at will.  Also, I hate the ones
where they quote the original poster line by line, then fill in their
responses in between.  I have a hard time distinguishing between the two
because there are seldom any spaces in between.

anklebear, who proudly leaves the original post dangling at the bottom of
her response  <G>

----- Original Message -----
From: Martin Fors <revmrf@kingcon.com>
To: <at-l@mailman.backcountry.net>
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 5:08 PM
Subject: [at-l] In the interest of loooooong posts


> Folks,
>
> I wonder why, when replying to someone's post, many include the original
> post.  Then it propagates on and on making loooonnnnger and
> llllooooonnnnneeeerr posts.
>
> "...the music of the songs I love is found in the open air."
> From a Danish children's song.
>
> Martin R. Fors [marty aka rusty]
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT-L mailing list
> AT-L@mailman.backcountry.net
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.313 / Virus Database: 174 - Release Date: 01/02/2002