[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] Almost totally un trail related

Subject: [at-l] Almost totally un trail related
From: bcalkins@disaster-relief.net (Bruce W. Calkins)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 13:02:36 -0500
In-Reply-To: <0570A090C50A294D93C6F59D634F21A7020172E9@esusa.oc.edu>

I have forgotten where I came across the answer to this one.
It relates to the circuit design in the counter in the original electronic
clocks,
and was carried over and hard coded in the Integrated circuits of today as
to expensive to redesign.
Black Wolfe

At 10:52 AM 12/13/01 -0600, you wrote:
>My question is this, "Why are the sleep/snooze functions on alarm clocks
>set for 9 minutes?"
>AT-L mailing list
>AT-L@mailman.backcountry.net
>http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l

References:
- [at-l] Almost totally un trail related
  - From: Phil.Heffington@oc.edu (Phil Heffington)

Prev by Date: [at-l] Nine minute snooze
Next by Date: [at-l] Leading a Group
Prev by thread: [at-l] Almost totally un trail related
Next by thread: [at-l] Almost totally un trail related
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread