[at-l] A.N.W.R. VOTE - not trail related

[hiker_00@hotmail.com (T. Woodworth)]

Petites boites!!!  Pete Seger!!!

Now that's "emblematic of Democrats".

Developing a short term supply of oil is not going to change our long term 
dependence.  The current debate is only the beginning of something much 
larger. It may mean more nuclear power or alternative energy sources but 
that also means it focuses us on reducing our dependence on fossil fuels.  
Won't it be a better day when acid rain and smog are history and clean air 
is taken for granted?

In twenty years very few of the vehicles currently on the road will still be 
in service.  In twenty years the national dependence on oil will be (should 
be) drastically different.  It seems bewildering to me why we are not making 
this the debate.

Furthermore, I think we all know that conservation is not just a personal 
virtue.  We've come a long way since 1970, why stop now?

Tim from PA


>>From: W F Thorneloe <thornel@attglobal.net>

>Little boxes on the hillside,
>Little boxes made of ticky-tocky
>Little boxes, little boxes
>and they all look just the same.

>There's a blue one and a red one
>and their all made of ticky-tocky
>Little boxes on the hillside
>and they all are just the same.

OrangeBug
<Beware of the little boxes>


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"My feets is tired, but my soul is rested."  -Mother Pollard


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp