[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] at-l] Is 53lbs. "lite"? Part II.

Subject: [at-l] at-l] Is 53lbs. "lite"? Part II.
From: halflifelost6@hotmail.com (Rich Bowyer)
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 19:04:44 -0500

>From: Jan Leitschuh

>Wow! Pringles have more fat than either summer sausage or pepperjack 
>cheese?


>Who knew?
Anyone who ever used them as firestarters?
~Rich  :o)

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

Follow-Ups:
- [at-l] at-l] Is 53lbs. "lite"? Part II.
  - From: sloetoe@yahoo.com (Sloetoe)

Prev by Date: "mechanism"... was Re: [at-l] A.N.W.R. VOTE - not trail related.
Next by Date: side note... Re: [at-l] energy clarification
Prev by thread: [at-l] at-l] Is 53lbs. "lite"? Part II.
Next by thread: [at-l] at-l] Is 53lbs. "lite"? Part II.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread