[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[4]: Same ol' message from Sloetoe... Re: Re[4]: [at-l] It is immoral
- Subject: Re[4]: Same ol' message from Sloetoe... Re: Re[4]: [at-l] It is immoral
- From: Bob Cummings <ellen@clinic.net> (Bob Cummings)
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 09:10:38 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <11f.4588457.28d165d2@aol.com>
- References: <11f.4588457.28d165d2@aol.com>
At least the list is becoming a bit more honest. When I raised the question about what was
acceptable several months ago I was assured that "of course" the list dealt with important matters
dealing with the future of the trail.
I guess most of us can figure out why Wingfoot felt obligated to start his own list and thus
"splitting the AT community" as several have complained.
I sense the list is made up of the trivial and the gutless, the smashmellows and those too timid
to speak up.
Weary