[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: [at-l] Three ridges

Subject: Re[2]: [at-l] Three ridges
From: thornel@attglobal.net (W F Thorneloe)
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 17:26:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <975513103.20010807151341@clinic.net>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010807150127.06140980@pop3.attglobal.net><20010807143828.63013.qmail@web12608.mail.yahoo.com><20010807143828.63013.qmail@web12608.mail.yahoo.com><5.1.0.14.2.20010807150127.06140980@pop3.attglobal.net>

Nothing at all. The trail belongs to many, including those who believe that 
tradition and purity is their private bailiwick.

OrangeBug

At 03:13 PM 8/7/2001 -0400, Bob Cummings wrote:
>...What is unfortunate about mentioning the obvious conflicts between thru 
>hiker desires and those of others?

References:
- [at-l] Three ridges
  - From: thornel@attglobal.net (W F Thorneloe)
- [at-l] AD Policy
  - From: datto_atl@yahoo.com (Datto)
- Re[2]: [at-l] Three ridges
  - From: Bob Cummings <ellen@clinic.net> (Bob Cummings)

Prev by Date: [at-l] Suggest A Section Hike?
Next by Date: [at-l] Brown Mountain Lights
Prev by thread: Re[2]: [at-l] Three ridges
Next by thread: [at-l] AD Policy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread