[at-l] Dangerous Doctors?

[kahley7@ptd.net (kahley)]

At 04:12 PM 6/23/01 -0400, David wrote:
>I'll tell you what. I've got an in-grown toenail and I'll let you know 
>what "risk assessment" I get when I go into have the toenail permanently 
>removed a la Nimblewill Nomad . . .

I had that done...on both my big toes.
You are in for an interesting week......



>On 6/23/2001 at 3:32 PM Texas Twelve-Step wrote:
>
> >> Sorry, but you are wrong. Risk assessment for violence
> >> toward self and others has always included queries
> >> regarding access to a variety of weapons and methods
> >> of causing injury.
> >
> >I didn't say that it wasn't. My argument is that it
> >was not always considered necessary to perform such
> >"risk assessment" on people who, for example, check
> >into the family doctor for treatment of an ingrown
> >toenail. Surely you've noticed the trend toward this
> >in recent years.
> >
> >Yer bud,
> >-TXIIS
> >_______________________________________________
> >AT-L mailing list
> >AT-L@mailman.backcountry.net
> >http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
>
>
>David Addleton
>http://dfaddleton.50megs.com
>vocate atque nonvocate deus aderit
>
>_______________________________________________
>AT-L mailing list
>AT-L@mailman.backcountry.net
>http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l