[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] The Anatomy of Flame Wars (was: Evidence Of Trailplace Effectiveness)

Subject: [at-l] The Anatomy of Flame Wars (was: Evidence Of Trailplace Effectiveness)
From: jmayer@rochester.rr.com (Jim Mayer)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:10:54 -0400
References: <99.1679f120.28603641@aol.com> <006a01c0f8cf$cd89e920$6501a8c0@wrc.xerox.com>

One typo...

That should have been:
>
> The chances of my picking #8 is pretty small.  Suppose I pick #3 or #4.  I
> send a message:

It's small, but it matters!

-- Jim

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Mayer" <jmayer@rochester.rr.com>
To: <RoksnRoots@aol.com>; <bullard@northnet.org>
Cc: <AT-L@mailman.backcountry.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:54 AM
Subject: [at-l] The Anatomy of Flame Wars (was: Evidence Of Trailplace
Effectiveness)


>
> The chances of my picking #7 is pretty small.  Suppose I pick #3 or #4.  I
> send a message:

References:
- [at-l] Evidence Of Trailplace Effectiveness
  - From: RoksnRoots@aol.com (RoksnRoots@aol.com)
- [at-l] The Anatomy of Flame Wars (was: Evidence Of Trailplace Effectiveness)
  - From: jmayer@rochester.rr.com (Jim Mayer)

Prev by Date: [at-l] Evidence Of Trailplace Effectiveness
Next by Date: [at-l] The Anatomy of Flame Wars
Prev by thread: [at-l] The Anatomy of Flame Wars (was: Evidence Of Trailplace Effectiveness)
Next by thread: [at-l] The Anatomy of Flame Wars
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread