[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] R 'n R's Apology For Traditionalism
- Subject: [at-l] R 'n R's Apology For Traditionalism
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Jim and/or Ginny Owen)
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:35:16 -0000
OK Rick - so I was trying to be lazy and you made me go back and find the
The number you're looking for is 235 - in 1990. Not quite double, but a
respectable - and significant increase over the 148 in 1987 (58+ %). The
peak effect takes 3 or 4 years to develop, not 2. '87 doesn't count, in '88
people start thinking about it, in '89 a few more of them get their act
together, in '90 - the peak load hits the Trail.
Go back and look at the effect of the 69 National Geographic article (1970 -
1973), and then the effect of the 1977 Geographic article (1978-1980). Been
there and done this analysis - just not recently. :-)
>>From: "Jim and/or Ginny Owen" <email@example.com>
>>It's been said before - but WF is and has always been a part of the
>>problem. His publicity efforts in 1987 (personal appearances in the
>> >towns along the way, newspaper interviews, etc.) to increase >awareness
>>of the AT in celebration of it's 50th anniversary brought >about an
>>immediate jump in thenumbers of thruhikers. I think the >numbers almost
>>doubled between 1987 and 1989.
>Not exactly, unless the completion rate or veracity of 2,000 miler claims
>changed dramatically during that time period.
>About 125 people reported hiking the entire AT in 1985.
>About 148 people reported hiking the entire AT in 1987.
>About 203 people reported hiking the entire AT in 1989.
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com