[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] History (wasWarning! WF Post)
Some more history, from my private archives, originally sent May of 1998:
- Gary from Fairfax
> >From firstname.lastname@example.org Mon May 4 18:05:56 1998
> From: "Ryan K. Brooks" <email@example.com>
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: ATML Re: [at-l] Why at-l and atml?
> If it makes more sense (and causes less confusion) I will take down the
> AT-L. I
> have also recommended to WF that I continue to run the AT-L and he
> continue to run
> his very excellent Trailplace.Com website, he's got to be pretty damn
> busy, right?
> :-) And he's doing a great job!
> I'd love to hear people's thoughts on this matter; please feel free to
> drop me an
> email (email@example.com).
> Ryan Brooks
> AT-L List Admin
> >>I think what you're referring to is my stated dislike of WF threads. My
> >>basic problem with these threads is a personal one that started the day the
> >>ATML went on line.
> >> At the time, the AT-L had been already operating for a few years and my
> >>concern was more of a net-etiquette one- if there's an existing mailing
> >>list, common sense says you don't start another one with the same subject
> >>matter, duplicate efforts and split the community. I spoke to Dan on the
> >>phone about this, but he just said that he "had to do it". I even offered
> >>to split up the web aspects and the mailing list efforts so we could work in
> >>our core competencies. ...clip...
> >AT-L mailing list
> AT-L mailing list