[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] cummulative elavation gain question
- Subject: [at-l] cummulative elavation gain question
- From: RoseMarie/Al Sarra" <rms2aas@earthlink.net (RoseMarie/Al Sarra)
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 19:42:28 -0400
- References: <200105121703.f4CH3GR96906@edina2.hack.net> <3AFDA8D0.6350@acadia.net>
----- Original Message -----
From: "RC Brooks" <rcbrooks@acadia.net>
To: <at-l@mailman.backcountry.net>
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [at-l] cummulative elavation gain question
> > Appalachian Trail Trivia
=SNIP=
> however, the finish rates for SoBo is significantly higher
> than that for NoBos.
=SNIP=
Besides the 'going downhill' hypothesis, does anybody have any legitimate
insights into why the SOBO completion rate would be so much better than the
NOBO ? Might it be that hiking independently ~ as opposed to hiking with a
herd ~ generates a more focused approach to the hike and a more job like
mind set ? Just curious.
And while I'm asking questions, completely off topic, do any of you computer
skilled individuals have any idea why the list of incoming Emails I get in
Outlook Express has suddenly started to omit the subject line from 75% or
more of the postings I receive - on list and off ?? Not the email itself,
just in the list of mail that has come in so I can't screen it for content.
Al (Draggin' Anchor)