[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[at-l] Translation, Please?---

Subject: [at-l] Translation, Please?---
From: lubitz@alpha.fdu.edu (Richard S. Lubitz)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 20:39:59 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <00e301c0b674$92e4bea0$c15291d1@dlbooher> from "Leslie Booher" at Mar 26, 2001 11:15:34 PM

Actually I think that we should communicate with Q signals and standard 
message #s.  Not only would it save bandwith, it would keep the WF posts 
short.
QRL?
73's
de N2CFJ
 > 
> ... -.- .. .--. .--. .. .
> .- .-.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AT-L mailing list
> AT-L@mailman.backcountry.net
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
>

References:
- [at-l] Translation, Please?---
  - From: lwbooher@halifax.com (Leslie Booher)

Prev by Date: [at-l] Starting to Worry
Next by Date: [at-l] BoyScoutHike1936
Prev by thread: [at-l] Translation, Please?---
Next by thread: [at-l] Translation, Please?---
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread