[at-l] Re: doubles

[David Hicks" <daveh@usit.net (David Hicks)]

Normally I only get doubles when someone has clearly done a reply-to-all, or
its equivalent.

However, I just got six copies of

----- Original Message -----
From: "Orange Bug" <orangebug74@yahoo.com>
To: "David Hicks" <daveh@usit.net>; "AT-L" <at-l@edina.hack.net>
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2001 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: [at-l] Strange Sighting

>From the "To:" line I understand two, but six?

BTW the time stamps were:

Saturday, January 13, 2001 5:38 PM
Saturday, January 13, 2001 5:38 PM
Saturday, January 13, 2001 5:38 PM
Saturday, January 13, 2001 5:43 PM
Saturday, January 13, 2001 5:44 PM
Saturday, January 13, 2001 5:48 PM

My guess is the three Saturday, January 13, 2001 5:38 PM's were the direct
to me copies and the Saturday, January 13, 2001 5:4x PM's where the relays
from at-l

Chainsaw





----- Original Message -----
From: "Uncle Milt" <mfw@mindspring.com>
To: "Bob Seiler" <deer@epix.net>; <at-l@backcountry.net>
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2001 1:41 PM
Subject: [at-l] Re: doubles


> Is anyone else getting double messages? Please reply direct to me, not the
> list.
> Thanks,
> Milt
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Seiler" <deer@epix.net>
> To: <at-l-admin@mailman.backcountry.net>
> Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2001 10:04 AM
> Subject: doubles
>
>
> > Ryan,
> >
> > Sorry to trouble you, but I'm receiving doubles of the AT list. Thanks
for
> > your efforts.
> >
> > Bob Seiler
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT-L mailing list
> AT-L@mailman.backcountry.net
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
>