[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [at-l] Sleeping bag - Part II
- Subject: Re: [at-l] Sleeping bag - Part II
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 11:46:11 -0800
RoseMarie/Al Sarra wrote:
> Those of you who found your mummy bags too constricting so you moved to a
> semi-rectangular bag - - how satisfied are you with the change??
Absolutely. I'm not big, and I'm not claustrophobic, but I hated waking up every
morning hogtied in my mummy, usually with the zipper pinned under my body. (Such
a lovely image...)
> Were you
> able to adequately find enough room for your legs in the semi or did you
> eventually change to the even heavier traditional bag?? And finally, was
> the weight change worth the comfort??
I went straight from a synthetic mummy to Campmor's down rectangular, 20*. It's
only 2.5#, so I actually lost weight and bulk.
Color me happy-
Give Me Chocolate
* From the AT-L | Need help? http://www.backcountry.net/faq.html *
==============================================================================
To: ronm@fallingwater.com, at-l@backcountry.net