Re: [at-l] Webster's

>"Richard S. Lubitz" wrote:
>
>> The problem is that you picked such a common word, we all overlooked it.
>> Sort of like hiding something in plain sight. I am now kicking myself for
>> failing to get such a simple word.
>> Rich
>>
>> > The word was...
>> >
>> > cuirass
>
>Hey, I just looked a word up and asked you to guess what it was. You didn't
have
>to. The real question here should be "Why? Why did you look up cuirass?"
Sometimes
>questions have no answers. Sometimes they do. Is this one of those times? I
think
>it might be. Though, certainly, I'm not sure of either situation, in the
sense of
>being sure of the answer to one of the questions. I would be remiss if I
didn't
>point out that the certainty of questions without answers being asked is
often
>times merely a way of asking what questions have no answers. Or, I suppose,
the
>realization that we didn't know the question, or the answer, before we were
asked
>what they are. I suppose. Yes, indeed, I do suppose.
>
>
>--
>Felix J. McGillicuddy
>ME-->GA '98
>"Your Move"
>http://Felixhikes.tripod.com/
>
>
>
>* From the AT-L |  Need help? http://www.backcountry.net/faq.html  *
>

* From the AT-L |  Need help? http://www.backcountry.net/faq.html  *

==============================================================================
To:            <tjfort@netdoor.com>, "Tim Rich" <app-trail@excite.com>
Cc:            <post@at-l.org>