RE: [at-l] Graymor

["Walt Daniels" <wdaniels@bestweb.net>]

Here is the article
http://www.nyjournalnews.com/news/14jn13.sht
however it is very one sided and incomplete. I have participated in most of
the negotiations for almost 15 years as the local AT supervisor. The
decision for eminent domain was ONLY because of the friars failure to
negotiate in good faith. We have had agreement in principle on many
occasions and then the friars fail to follow thru.

Please don't construe this as any reflection on the extremely helpful and
friendly friars who have hosted the AT hikers over the years. They are not
high enough in the heirarchy to be involved in land discussions.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-at-l@backcountry.net [mailto:owner-at-l@backcountry.net]On
> Behalf Of hudsom@us.ibm.com
> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 9:19 AM
> To: at-l@backcountry.net
> Subject: [at-l] Graymor
>
>
> Not having very many details maybe I should hold on this post, but then
> maybe someone else can provide some info.
> Going throught the deli for my morning coffee there was a copy of the
> Putnam County newspaper, with a front page story that the NPS is trying to
> exercise eminent domain to obtain the AT trail corridor through
> the Graymor
> property. I'm kicking myself for not having picked up the paper, anyone
> with anymore details out there?
>
> Skeeter
>
>
> * From the AT-L |  Need help? http://www.backcountry.net/faq.html  *
>

* From the AT-L |  Need help? http://www.backcountry.net/faq.html  *

==============================================================================