[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [at-l] Re-Re-Reply
Karen,
I agree that our reply's often do not follow the subject line. Usually
when I follow a thread I pick up on the subject changes. When someone
reply's to a message several days after the original discussion it is
easy enough to scroll down and get a clue at that time. Thank goodness
for my wheel mouse. It does make all this scrolling easier :-)
KarenS62@aol.com wrote:
>
> See Chase,
>
> The problem with that is I could just start rambling and rambling and you
> wouldn't neccesarily know what I was replying to. Am I replying to the
> question about your mysterious 'extra' lines or how most mail servers are set
> up? This would be a perfect solution if every email had only one topic a
> person could reply to, but many of us tend to lump more than piece of
> information in an email.
>
> POG
> (still in AOL email h***)
>
> In a message dated 6/26/2000 4:55:43 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> wb4pan@mindspring.com writes:
>
> << I was just noticing how much easier it is to read a particular thread
> on this List Serve when the Replies are at the top of the message
> instead of below the quoted material >>
> * From the AT-L | Need help? http://www.backcountry.net/faq.html *
* From the AT-L | Need help? http://www.backcountry.net/faq.html *
==============================================================================