[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] Re: GMC's a heavy, heavy brand of hiker.
- Subject: [at-l] Re: GMC's a heavy, heavy brand of hiker.
- From: Pat Villeneuve <patv@falcon.cc.ukans.edu>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 19:39:45 -0500
- Cc: at-l@backcountry.net
- Organization: Spencer Museum of Art - University of Kansas
Thomas McGinnis wrote:
>
> Awwwcoughcoughcoughcoughsputtercoughawwwsputtercoughcough.
> (Sloetoe posts where he got the temerarious idea that GMC's a heavy-weight.)
> >>> Pat Villeneuve <patv@falcon.cc.ukans.edu> 04/17/00 01:29AM >>>
> I'm not claustrophobic, and I'm not big, but I always seem to end up
> hog-tied in a mummy bag. I have plenty of room in a rectangular, and I
> can scrunch it around my in any configuration. With down,
>
> it's so light that the few extra ounces don't matter.
Alright, alright. Here's what I meant: Down is so light that a
rectangular down sleeping bag still comes out lighter than the
synthetics. Mine is 2.5#. Okay?
Chocolate
* From the AT-L | Need help? http://www.backcountry.net/faq.html *
==============================================================================