[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [at-l] Companion vs Handbook...
- Subject: Re: [at-l] Companion vs Handbook...
- From: "Kenneth R. Knight" <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 02:25:13 -0500
Not to mention a Sharp Telemail, modern camera (it has computer chips in
it after all; and that doesn't even begin to touch digital camaeras), or
people who might have disabilities of any sort (his site would be much
more useful if he didn't use a tiny font, sizing it down by 1 from the
standard size and choosing a small font in the first place).
Besides, I still haven't gotten the 2000 edition of his book. Need to
call the bank and find out what happened with the check and void it if I
can (I got my ALDHA 2000 Companion just a few days after ordering it).
** Ken **
On 2/29/2000 12:37 AM The Redhead DaRedhead@aol.com wrote:
>One might mention here that it would be hard to get a jury of twelve using
>that criteria <vbg> And you'd probably have to rule out anyone carrying a
>cel phone . . .
** Kenneth Knight Web Design, IT Consultant, Software Engineer **
** firstname.lastname@example.org http://home.msen.com/~krk **
* From the AT-L | Need help? http://www.backcountry.net/faq.html *