[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[at-l] Symbolism over Substance?
- Subject: [at-l] Symbolism over Substance?
- From: The Wizard <tschamp@tiac.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 01:43:57 -0500
At 12:40 PM 2/12/00 -0500, Coosa wrote:
>Thank you to all who have enlightened me about the 2000-Miler patch and
>rocker.
<snip>
> Anyone can "say" they're a
>ThruHiker -- anyone can wear a ThruHiker/2000-Miler patch (and rocker, I
>suppose) -- and if they say it outside of the Trail Community, which may or
>may not be able to document the truth, then it doesn't matter?
Yes, kids, there once was/is a large radio/TV commentator who would chime
in with "symbolism over substance" at least once a show to prove his point.
So is that what we've come down to here? Is thiis mythical legion of
non-purist fakers out there getting paid large sums for their misstated
deeds? Methinks not. So who cares about patches, earned or purchased?
This isn't the military: you don't have to salute.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Wizard! Taking his time getting there...
* From the AT-L | Need help? http://www.backcountry.net/faq.html *
==============================================================================