[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [at-l] Camping on Saddleback?
- Subject: Re: [at-l] Camping on Saddleback?
- From: kahley7 <kahley7@ptd.net>
- Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 17:33:16 -0500
>
>
><< That posting reminded me. Since my departure from the other list I have
> lost track of the status of the Saddleback issue. Does anybody know what
> ever happened there??
> >>
This comes thrd hand from another source......
It seems that according to Underhill, the National Park Service has identified
Alternative #2 (which would protect the visual foreground zone of the
Appalachian Trail) as its "preferred alternative" in the Summary Report
* From the AT-L | Need help? http://www.backcountry.net/faq.html *
==============================================================================