Re: Re: [at-l] Why am I bigger?

["Thomas McGinnis" <tmcginnis@ucclan.state.in.us>]

Ahem. One refuting observation does not a hypothesis blow. OK, boisengirls, who gained/lost with change in tax filing status?
Maybe Solar Bear has gained somewhere else. Sir? Notice anything? (Remember, though, this is a family list, too.)

>>> <KarenS62@aol.com> 01/07/00 11:31AM >>>
about whether the gain was not directly attributable to 
the recent loss of, um, or rather *gain* of "Single" status. 

But with THAT theory, wouldn't Solar Bear now be 6'3"? Time for a new theory.

POg



* From the AT-L |  Need help? http://www.backcountry.net/faq.html  *

==============================================================================